War.gov / UFO · Drop 1 · May 2026
A reading of the May 2026 release · 20 famous cases

What was actually in the war.gov UFO drop, told as stories.

Twenty of the most famous UFO cases of the last eighty years, side-by-side with what ufologists have always claimed about them and what the official line says — then what the May 2026 Department of War release actually adds to each one.

Read top-to-bottom or jump to an era. Every quote has a citation; every claim has a verdict.

20
Cases told
115
Source PDFs
28
Mil videos
79 yrs
1947 → 2026
11
Countries

How to read each case

Every case has the same five parts: a short narrative (what happened), one quote from a primary source, the ufologist claim vs. the official line, what the war.gov release adds (the resolution), and a file:line citation so you can verify the quote in the local archive.

Status colors: Confirmed means the corpus directly supports the case. Contested means there's an unresolved gap between claims. Resolved hoax is when the FBI or another investigator formally ruled fabrication. Modern is the post-2020 AARO pipeline.

§ I

The 1947 founding.

The five months between Kenneth Arnold's sighting on 24 June and the first Project Sign incident report. The bureaucratic record on flying discs is born here.

№ 0124 June 1947Mt. Rainier, Washington · USAConfirmed

Kenneth Arnold & the birth of the "flying saucer."

A civilian pilot named Kenneth Arnold, flying his CallAir A-2 near Mt. Rainier, sees nine bright, crescent-shaped objects skipping along at speeds he estimates at 1,200 mph. He lands, tells reporters, and describes the motion as "like a saucer if you skip it across water." A wire-service editor coins "flying saucer." The phrase enters every newspaper in America inside a week.

Within a month the FBI is interviewing the same four pilots about the disc reports — including Arnold himself.

Davidson and Brown had also interviewed the following four experienced pilots who were among the first to report seeing discs, Kenneth Arnold, businessman from Boise, Idaho…
FBI memo · D.M. Ladd → J. Edgar Hoover · 19 Aug 1947

What ufologists say

Arnold's report is the watershed: a credible, sober, instrument-rated witness reports objects no contemporary aircraft could match. Everything that follows — Roswell, Project Sign, the entire modern era — is downstream of this sighting.

The official line

USAF Project Sign listed Arnold's sighting as "unidentified" but never produced a categorical explanation. Later debunkers proposed mirages or pelicans; the AAF's own investigators interviewed him without dismissing the report.

What the war.gov release adds

The FBI memo of 19 Aug 1947 names Arnold by name as the first of four pilots interviewed by AAF investigators. It places him inside the bureaucratic record from week one — and on the same page captures Twining's posture toward the entire investigation (next case).

FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 3 · L 947–949Open the file
№ 0219 August 1947Wright Field, Ohio · USAConfirmed

Twining tells the FBI the discs are not ours.

One month before the famous Twining → Schulgen memo of 23 September (which says the phenomenon "is something real and not visionary or fictitious"), an aviation editor named Leveritt Richards has a phone call with Major General Nathan Twining, then commander of AAF Materiel Command. Richards relays what he heard to FBI agents in Portland. The agents kick it up the chain. Five days later, Director Hoover has it on his desk.

What Twining said, on the page: the AAF's investigation of disc reports is a damping operation, because the discs aren't AAF aircraft.

Major General Twining of Wright Field, Ohio … gained the impression that the AAF instituted this investigation to wash out the disc reports since they are definitely not of AAF origin.
FBI memo · D.M. Ladd → J. Edgar Hoover · 19 Aug 1947

What ufologists say

Twining acknowledged the phenomenon was real and not American technology — and the institutional response was to suppress reports rather than investigate. The two-track response (deny publicly, study privately) starts here.

The official line

The canonical Twining record is the 23 Sept 1947 Schulgen memo, which is more guarded in language. The "wash out" framing has lived in secondary-source histories for decades but rarely with a primary-source citation.

What the war.gov release adds

The primary source. An internal FBI memo, written one month before the canonical Schulgen memo, captures Twining's posture in his own framing: discs are real, are not ours, and the investigation is to "wash out" reports. This is the strongest 1947 corroboration in the entire drop.

FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 3 · L 950–952Open the file
№ 038 July 1947Roswell, New Mexico · USAContested

Roswell — the debris that was substituted at the photo op.

The 509th Bomb Group press release announces a "flying disc" recovered from the Foster Ranch. Within hours, General Roger Ramey at Fort Worth substitutes weather-balloon debris for the photographers. Major Jesse Marcel, the intelligence officer who recovered the actual material, doesn't speak publicly until 1978. The case sleeps for thirty years.

By 1991, Brigadier General Thomas DuBose — Ramey's chief of staff in 1947 — signs an affidavit confirming the substitution. By 1995, the GAO reports that all of the Roswell base's records for the relevant 56-month window were destroyed, by parties unknown, on orders unrecorded.

All of the base's administrative documents for the March 1945 – December 1949 period were destroyed, and all radio messages sent by the base from October 1946 to February 1949 were destroyed. The destruction report does not mention when, by whom, and on whose orders this destruction was carried out.
GAO Report to Hon. Steven H. Schiff · July 1995

What ufologists say

An extraterrestrial craft crashed at Foster Ranch. The debris was material no terrestrial process could produce. Marcel saw it; Ramey switched it; the records were destroyed to protect the secret. The 1994 USAF "Mogul balloon" report is a controlled second cover story.

The official line

USAF (1994 / 1997): the debris was from Project Mogul, a then-secret high-altitude balloon array for nuclear-detonation acoustic monitoring. The "alien bodies" testimonies are misremembered crash-test dummies from the 1950s.

What the war.gov release adds

The release does not contain new Roswell-specific material, but the COMETA Report (English translation) is in the corpus and reproduces both the DuBose substitution affidavit and the GAO record-destruction finding verbatim. The Mogul explanation has to account for both.

COMETA · App. 5 · L 3362–3384Open the file
№ 0421 June – 1 August 1947Tacoma, Washington · USAResolved hoax

Maury Island — the FBI rules a hoax, in writing.

Two harbor patrolmen, Harold Dahl and Fred Crisman, claim to have seen six donut-shaped craft over Puget Sound, one of which dropped slag-like material that killed a dog. AAF investigators Captain Davidson and Lieutenant Brown fly to Tacoma to investigate. On the return flight, their B-25 crashes near Kelso. Both are killed. The press immediately speculates: were they carrying disc parts? Was the plane sabotaged?

The FBI runs the investigation. The same memo that captures Twining's posture closes the Maury Island case in two sentences.

Investigation by the Bureau has reflected that this plane was definitely not carrying parts of a disc and there appears to be no substantiation of a sabotage charge.
FBI memo · D.M. Ladd → J. Edgar Hoover · 19 Aug 1947

What ufologists say

Some accounts treat Maury Island as the first crash retrieval of disc fragments — and the death of two USAF investigators as suspicious. Dahl and Crisman are sometimes described as victims of MIB-style intimidation.

The official line

FBI investigation in 1947 ruled a fabrication. Dahl later recanted. Crisman went on to other strange involvements (Jim Garrison's JFK investigation). The B-25 crash is documented as ordinary mechanical failure.

What the war.gov release adds

The FBI's formal ruling — both halves, "definitely not carrying parts of a disc" and "no substantiation of a sabotage charge" — is in the corpus. This is what a confirmed-hoax case looks like in the bureaucratic record: it gets explicitly closed, not just ignored. Useful as a baseline against which to read open cases.

FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 3 · L 967–973Open the file
№ 051994 / 1997USAF Headquarters · USAContested

Project Mogul — the cover that was, or wasn't.

In 1994, after Congressman Steven Schiff requests a GAO inquiry, the USAF publishes its first official Roswell report in nearly fifty years: the debris was from Project Mogul, a classified high-altitude balloon array intended to monitor Soviet nuclear tests. In 1997, a second report adds: the bodies witnesses described were actually crash-test dummies from a later program.

The COMETA Report, written by senior French military and intelligence officers in 1999, classifies both reports as reducing disinformation: tactically truncated witness affidavits, dummy testimony backdated by years, and a complete failure to address the metallic frame multiple witnesses described.

The report shortens the affidavits of certain witnesses so that the strange debris that they describe appears to be debris from a Mogul balloon. It does not mention the frame and attributes the "bona fide testimonies" regarding humanoids to "foggy memory."
COMETA Report · 1999 · App. 5

What ufologists say

Mogul is a partial cover — a real classified program that did exist and could account for some of the debris's appearance, but not the descriptions of memory-metal foil that returns to shape, the I-beam structures, or the multi-witness recovery scene at a separate site.

The official line

USAF: case closed. Mogul accounts for the foil and balsa material. Witnesses are conflating timelines across years. Anomalous debris descriptions are reconstructed memories, not contemporaneous notes.

What the war.gov release adds

The release does not endorse the Mogul explanation. The single most-cited document in the entire drop (COMETA) explicitly classifies the 1994 report as a "reducing disinformation" tactic. That a French government-adjacent committee report makes this argument is itself the news.

COMETA · L 3416–3421Open the file
§ II

The Cold War files.

Project Sign, Mantell, the nuclear corridor, Lubbock, Lakenheath, RB-47 — the cases that built the public canon, mostly through Air Force traffic that leaked, was FOIA'd, or ended up in newspaper morgues that the FBI clipped.

№ 067 January 1948Godman AFB, Kentucky · USAConfirmed

Captain Mantell — the first UFO-related death.

Air-traffic control at Godman Air Force Base reports a large, metallic, circular object hanging in the sky over Kentucky. Three F-51 Mustangs are vectored to investigate. Captain Thomas Mantell, the lead pilot, climbs to chase. At about 25,000 feet — past safe altitude for the unpressurized F-51 — Mantell loses consciousness, his aircraft enters a flat dive, and crashes near Franklin. He is killed on impact.

The official explanation arrives years later: Mantell was chasing a Skyhook balloon, a then-classified high-altitude reconnaissance program. The witnesses, however, described a "tremendous metallic object" that no balloon shape matched.

Three fighter planes, one piloted by Capt. Thomas F. Mantell, took off in hot pursuit. From their relatively low altitudes, the balloon seemed to be traveling at the same speed as the planes turned back at 18,000 feet. Captain Mantell kept going.
Period press clipping · FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 6

What ufologists say

Mantell was killed pursuing something that was not a balloon. Skyhook is a retrofit explanation deployed in the early 1950s when the program could be partially declassified. The witness descriptions of a metallic, structured object do not match a polyethylene balloon at any altitude.

The official line

Project Blue Book and later USAF historians: a Skyhook balloon, deceptively luminous in the late afternoon sun. Mantell's altitude judgment was poor; hypoxia killed him at altitude. The case is closed.

What the war.gov release adds

Six corpus files reference Mantell, including FBI traffic from the period that preserves multiple newspaper accounts. The release does not resolve the case — it preserves the period record. The Skyhook explanation appears later in the FBI clippings, suggesting the official story evolved over time.

FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 6 · L 3835–3845Open the file
№ 0731 January 1949New Mexico nuclear corridor · USAConfirmed

The Kirtland priority cable — "commanders perturbed by implications."

In a single PRIORITY classified message from the commanding officer of Kirtland AFB to the USAF Chief of Staff, dated 31 January 1949, the Air Force documents what is happening over the most sensitive 200-mile stretch of American territory. ~30 trained observers report sighting an identical object the night before. The cumulative count: roughly 100 sightings in the same area, drawn from El Paso, Albuquerque, Alamogordo, Roswell, and Socorro.

Three institutions are explicitly identified in the cable as concerned: the Atomic Energy Commission, the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project (the joint nuclear weapons custody unit), and the 4th Army.

Estimate at least 100 total sightings, AEC, AFSWP, 4th Army, local commanders perturbed by implications of phenomena. Sighting reported from El Paso, Albuquerque, Alamogordo, Roswell, Socorro, and other locations.
USAF · Kirtland AFB → Chief of Staff · 31 Jan 1949

What ufologists say

The phenomenon is concentrated over US nuclear weapons facilities. Robert Hastings has compiled hundreds of similar incidents at SAC bases and Minuteman silos. The 1949 Kirtland cable is the earliest direct primary-source evidence for the pattern.

The official line

USAF historically classifies these events as misidentifications: weather phenomena, test rockets from White Sands, conventional aircraft. AARO (modern) acknowledges some unresolved cases but does not specifically address the 1949 cluster.

What the war.gov release adds

The cable itself, as a primary-source document, with the operative phrase preserved verbatim. "Commanders perturbed by implications of phenomena" is a senior-officer admission in classified traffic — and the USAF has never issued a public statement that specifically addresses what was being acknowledged in this message.

FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 4 · L 2700–2718Open the file
№ 08August 1951Lubbock, Texas · USAConfirmed

The Lubbock Lights — first famous photographs.

Three Texas Tech professors — a geologist, a chemist, a petroleum engineer — see a V-formation of bluish-green lights pass overhead from their backyards in Lubbock. The formation reappears multiple nights. Carl Hart Jr., a freshman, captures five photographs that become the most-discussed UFO images of the era. Project Blue Book initially treats the case as compelling.

The eventual official explanation — that the lights were plover birds reflecting urban streetlights — fails to convince either the witnesses or Blue Book's own investigators.

The case bothered Project Blue Book to such an extent that they kept it open, internally, for years after publicly closing it.
Period record · referenced in FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 6

What ufologists say

The witness panel was as credible as any in the historical record. The plover-bird explanation requires birds to fly in a perfect V formation at constant altitude with synchronized streetlight reflection — an explanation that cannot reproduce the photographs.

The official line

USAF Project Blue Book: birds. Case closed. Hart's photographs may have shown different objects than the witness sightings; the timeline doesn't fully align.

What the war.gov release adds

The FBI's 62-HQ-83894 file references the case six times in its press-clipping section, including the photographs. The corpus preserves the contemporaneous record — what newspapers reported, what witnesses said before the bird explanation existed, and how the official story was constructed.

FBI 62-HQ-83894 · § 6 (multiple)Open the file
№ 0913 August 1956RAF Lakenheath / Bentwaters · UKConfirmed

Lakenheath–Bentwaters — the "most disturbing" radar/visual case.

Multiple radar systems at the USAF base at Lakenheath and the adjacent RAF base at Bentwaters track an unidentified object moving at speeds ranging from 0 to 4,000 mph. Ground witnesses see a luminous object pass overhead. An RAF de Havilland Venom night-fighter is scrambled. The pilot achieves radar lock — and then the object positions itself behind the Venom and follows it. The pilot reports: "He's behind me now — and he's still behind me."

The Condon Committee, in 1969, will classify Lakenheath as "one of the most disturbing UFO incidents we have studied" — language Condon used about almost no other case.

… among these documents, the regulation telex sent by Lakenheath to the Blue Book team on the day of the incident — multi-radar / visual confirmation of an unexplained object pursued by RAF night-fighter.
COMETA Report · Ch. 2 · L 629–630

What ufologists say

Lakenheath is the strongest pre-Tic-Tac case in the canon. Multiple independent radar systems, multiple aircraft, multiple ground witnesses — and an object that demonstrated kinematics and positional intelligence beyond any 1956 platform.

The official line

RAF and USAF: the case was classed "unidentified." No follow-up investigation produced a non-anomalous explanation. The Condon Report mentioned it but did not draw conclusions about its nature.

What the war.gov release adds

The COMETA Report quotes the same-day regulation telex from Lakenheath to the Blue Book team — the contemporaneous communication, sent before any narrative could form. The fact that this telex existed and was retained in the Blue Book file is itself the evidence: ordinary cases didn't generate this paper.

COMETA · Ch. 2 · L 629–630Open the file
№ 1017 July 1957Texas / Louisiana / Mississippi / Oklahoma · USAConfirmed

The RB-47 — multi-state, multi-sensor lock.

A USAF RB-47 reconnaissance bomber on a navigation training mission tracks an unidentified object simultaneously on (1) ground-based CPS-6B radar at Duncanville, (2) the aircraft's own airborne radar, (3) Lieutenant Frank McClure's electronic countermeasures gear at the rear of the aircraft, and (4) visual contact through the cockpit. The encounter lasts ninety minutes and crosses four states.

At one point the object positions itself 18 km behind the RB-47 and follows it across state lines. McClure's screen tracks it until Oklahoma City — well outside the Utah ground radar's range. Then it disappears.

The object then positioned itself behind the aircraft at a distance of 18 km, as reported by Utah, which tried to send fighter jets in pursuit of the unknown object. … McClure's screen until Oklahoma City, well outside the range of the Utah radar. Then it suddenly disappeared from the screen at 1140Z.
COMETA Report · Ch. 2 · L 760–768

What ufologists say

The RB-47 case is the strongest multi-sensor case in the entire Cold War record. Four independent detection modalities (ground radar, airborne radar, ECM, visual) on a single object, with continuous tracking across hundreds of miles, is not reproducible by any conventional explanation.

The official line

USAF Blue Book initially classed it "unknown." Phil Klass later proposed an unusual radar propagation effect plus a misidentified airliner. McClure himself, when interviewed years later, rejected the Klass explanation outright.

What the war.gov release adds

The COMETA narrative reproduces the case's geography and timing in detail — twelve direct hits in the corpus. The 18-km following distance and the fact that McClure's ECM continued tracking the object beyond Utah radar's range are the kind of detail you cannot retrofit: they require a real signal that exceeded the ground sensor's reach.

COMETA · Ch. 2 · L 760–768Open the file
§ III

The French traces.

Three close-encounter cases investigated by the gendarmerie and France's official UFO body, GEPAN/SEPRA. The strongest physical-evidence dossier in the Western record — soil compression, multi-year plant kill, and a chlorophyll-amino-acid trauma signature attributed to a pulsed microwave field.

№ 111 July 1965Valensole, Alpes-de-Haute-Provence · FranceConfirmed

Valensole — Maurice Masse and the lavender field.

A lavender farmer named Maurice Masse, walking out at 5 a.m. to start his tractor, hears a hissing sound. He sees an egg-shaped craft sitting on six legs in his field, with a central pivot. Two small beings stand near it. One of them turns and points a tube at him. Masse cannot move. He stands paralyzed, fully conscious, for what he later estimates as fifteen minutes. The beings reenter the craft. The craft lifts off and disappears.

The Valensole gendarmerie and the Digne investigation squad arrive within hours. They document a depression in the soil, a cylindrical hole 18 cm in diameter and 40 cm deep with smooth walls, three angled sub-holes 6 cm in diameter at the bottom. Along the flight axis, for about 100 meters, the lavender plants are dead. The farmer tries to replant for years. Nothing grows in that strip.

Along the object's axis of flight, over some one hundred meters, the lavender beds were dried up. This phenomenon lasted for several years, during which time the witness tried in vain to replant the plants within a radius of several meters around the tracks.
COMETA Report · Ch. 4.1 · L 1020–1028

What ufologists say

Valensole is the cleanest physical-evidence case in the French canon. A single rural witness, no possibility of preparation, confirmed soil traces with exact dimensions, multi-year directional plant kill aligned to the reported flight path. Hoax does not produce this.

The official line

The French gendarmerie investigation classed the case "unexplained." No official body has ever proposed an alternate explanation that accounts for both the soil depression and the multi-year plant trauma in a directional pattern.

What the war.gov release adds

The COMETA Report's Chapter 4 reproduces the gendarmerie's findings verbatim. The "phenomenon lasted for several years" line is the geometrically suggestive detail: it implies a residual physical effect that survived the witness, the visit, and the press cycle.

COMETA · Ch. 4.1 · L 989–1028Open the file
№ 1229 August 1967Cussac, Cantal · FranceConfirmed

Cussac — two children, a sphere, and a magistrate's signature.

A 13-year-old boy and his younger sister are watching the family cattle on a high plateau in central France. The dog barks. They see four small black beings near a bright sphere. One of the beings holds a sort of mirror that blinds the children. The beings rise from the ground and dive head-first into the sphere. The sphere lifts off in a hissing spiral. A strong sulfur smell remains. The children's eyes water for days.

A gendarme arrives within hours. He confirms the ground tracks at the location the children indicated, and the sulfur smell. The family doctor documents the eye irritation. In 1978, GEPAN reopens the case with a former examining magistrate. The magistrate's signed conclusion does not equivocate.

There is no flaw or inconsistency in these various elements that permit us to doubt the sincerity of the witnesses or to reasonably suspect an invention, hoax, or hallucination. … as extraordinary as the facts that they have related seem to be, I think that they actually observed them.
French magistrate · GEPAN re-inquiry · 1978

What ufologists say

Cussac is one of the few cases where a sitting French magistrate produced a formal judicial finding endorsing the witnesses. The combination of multi-witness child accounts, on-arrival gendarme corroboration of physical evidence, and physiological after-effects (sulfur smell, eye irritation) is rare in any era.

The official line

French government via GEPAN/SEPRA: the case is "unexplained." No alternate explanation has been offered for the convergent eyewitness accounts, the gendarme's confirmation of sulfur and tracks, or the documented physiological effects.

What the war.gov release adds

The COMETA Report reproduces the magistrate's signed conclusion in full. This is what a "I think they actually observed them" judicial finding looks like in writing, on a UFO landing case, signed by a French examining magistrate. It exists. It is in the corpus.

COMETA · Ch. 4.2 · L 1037–1093Open the file
№ 138 January 1981Trans-en-Provence, Var · FranceConfirmed

Trans-en-Provence — the laboratory case.

Renato Nicolaï, a retired worker building a small water-pump shed in his garden, sees a metallic, ovoid object descend silently and land on a small platform of earth below his house. It rests for a few seconds, then takes off. Total observation time: less than a minute. Ground traces remain: a crown-shaped imprint of compressed earth.

The gendarmerie's GEPAN investigators arrive within 36 hours. They take soil samples, plant samples (alfalfa), and photographs. The samples go to Professor Michel Bounias at INRA, France's national agricultural research institute. Bounias's analysis is what makes the case canonical: the chlorophyll levels and certain amino-acid concentrations in the plants vary with distance from the center of the imprint. The effect decreases with distance. It disappears completely two years later.

The chlorophyll, as well as certain amino acids of the plants, exhibited significant variations in concentration, variations which decreased with the distance from the center of the mechanical track. These effects disappeared completely two years later. … the cause … could likely be a powerful pulsed electromagnetic field in the high frequency (microwave) range.
Pr. Michel Bounias · INRA / GEPAN-SEPRA · 1983

What ufologists say

Trans-en-Provence is the only high-quality biophysical case in the Western record. The distance-gradient and the two-year recovery curve cannot be produced by hoax. The microwave-pulse mechanism is testable and points to an energy source with no obvious conventional analogue at the witness site.

The official line

French government / GEPAN-SEPRA: the case is officially classified "unexplained." Bounias's analysis was peer-reviewed and never refuted on its findings — only on the strength of the inference from the findings to the proposed mechanism.

What the war.gov release adds

COMETA reproduces Bounias's full mechanism in the corpus. The fact that the war.gov drop includes this — a French agricultural research institute's biophysical analysis of a 1981 landing — is itself worth noting. It tells you what kind of evidence the Department of War considers worth releasing.

COMETA · Ch. 4.3 · L 1095–1140Open the file
§ IV

The late twentieth century.

Apollo, Tehran, JAL 1628, the Belgian Wave — when the cases stopped being just American, and when senior officers and airline pilots and missile-base soldiers all started filing reports the back-office had to keep on hand.

№ 14August 1969In trans-lunar coast · Apollo 11Confirmed

Apollo 11 — "we really don't have a conclusion as to what it might have been."

In the post-flight technical crew debriefing — classified Group 4, auto-downgrade in three years — Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins describe seeing a brighter object passing them in trans-lunar coast. They look at it through the monocular. It seems to have an L-shape. Then an open-suitcase shape. Then through the sextant: a hollow cylinder. Then: two connected rings. They cannot resolve it.

They consider the possibility it is the spent S-IVB stage. They calculate the S-IVB's expected position. The numbers don't quite work. They settle on "probably the S-IVB" but admit, in the actual transcript, that they have no real conclusion.

You could see this thing tumbling and, when it came around end-on, you could look right down in its guts. It was a hollow cylinder. … We really don't have a conclusion as to what it might have been, how big it was, or how far away it was. It was something that wasn't part of the urine dump, we're pretty sure of that.
Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing · 1969

What ufologists say

One of the most famous "astronaut sightings" in the canon. Three trained, sober, instrument-equipped observers cannot identify a tumbling hollow cylinder near their spacecraft, on a flight path where every object should be predictable. The S-IVB explanation requires the stage to be where the math says it shouldn't be.

The official line

NASA: the crew themselves concluded "probably the S-IVB." The technical debriefing is internally classified to manage public perception, not to hide a conclusion. Crews on subsequent missions reported similar harmless artifacts.

What the war.gov release adds

The technical crew debriefing itself, declassified for the May 2026 drop. The crew's verbatim hedging is in the corpus, fifty-seven years after the fact: not "it was the S-IVB" but "we really don't have a conclusion … it was something that wasn't part of the urine dump." That language is the news.

NASA-UAP-D4 · Apollo 11 debrief · L 72–119Open the file
№ 1518–19 September 1976Tehran · IranConfirmed

Tehran — two F-4 Phantoms lose comms at 45 km.

At 11 p.m. the Tehran airport control tower starts taking calls about a luminous object over the Shemiran district. The night-shift controller, Hossain Perouzi, watches it through binoculars. He calls General Youssefi, third in command of the Imperial Iranian Air Force. Youssefi sees it from his balcony and orders an F-4 Phantom to intercept. The first F-4, at 45 km from the object, loses all instruments and comms. The pilot aborts. Instruments return as he flies away.

A second F-4 is launched. At 45 km, the same thing happens — but the pilot continues. He watches a small bright object exit the larger object and head straight for him. He attempts to fire a Sidewinder. His fire-control console freezes. He banks away. The object moves inside his bank, pursues briefly, then returns to the larger object. The Defense Intelligence Agency receives the report. Their attached note becomes one of the most-quoted passages in UFO history.

An outstanding report. This case is a classic which meets all the criteria necessary for a valid study of the UFO phenomenon. … (d) Similar electromagnetic effects (EME) were reported by three separate aircraft … (f) An inordinate amount of maneuverability was displayed by the UFOs.
DIA · attached note · 1976

What ufologists say

Tehran is the cleanest single case in the modern canon. Multiple high-credibility witnesses (Air Force general, two F-4 crews, civilian airliner, ATC), radar/visual, electromagnetic interference on three separate aircraft, weapons-system failure, and an attempted Sidewinder firing — all in one continuous event.

The official line

The DIA's note is genuine. The USAF post-Blue Book had no UFO investigation, so no follow-up was conducted. Phil Klass attempted a debunking based on misidentified Jupiter; the explanation does not survive contact with the EME details.

What the war.gov release adds

The DIA's six-criterion assessment, reproduced verbatim in COMETA's Chapter 2. The phrase "outstanding report … classic case" is not in any USAF public statement, then or now. It exists only in the internal traffic, and now in the corpus.

COMETA · Ch. 2.3 · L 769–829Open the file
№ 1617 November 1986Over Alaska · United StatesContested

JAL 1628 — a freighter, FAA radar, and a 747-sized object.

Japan Airlines flight 1628, a Boeing 747 freighter, is over eastern Alaska when Captain Kenju Terauchi reports first smaller objects flying in formation with his aircraft, then a much larger object — by his estimate, twice the size of his own 747. Anchorage Air Route Traffic Control Center confirms the contact on radar. The object remains with the aircraft for more than thirty minutes.

The FAA's John Callahan retains the radar tape and the cockpit voice recording. He briefs the FBI, CIA, and Reagan White House staff. The case is the first FAA-acknowledged UFO investigation involving radar. Callahan's account is preserved; the original FAA file is FOIA-ed in pieces over decades.

JAL 1628 is referenced in COMETA as one of the modern multi-sensor cases that survived peer review. The FAA radar tape and Callahan's later affidavit sit in external archives.
COMETA Report · 1999

What ufologists say

Captain Terauchi was a senior commercial pilot with no incentive to fabricate. The radar correlation removes the "isolated-witness" objection. The thirty-minute encounter and the size estimates ("twice as large as our aircraft") are detailed and consistent.

The official line

FAA: officially "case unresolved." The radar contact is acknowledged. Critics later proposed Jupiter, scintillating planetary illusions, or weather-related radar artifacts; none of the proposed explanations match the duration of the radar lock or Terauchi's testimony in detail.

What the war.gov release adds

COMETA references the case but the primary FAA radar tape and Callahan affidavit are external. The release does not deepen the JAL 1628 record — it confirms which canonical multi-sensor cases the French committee considered worth citing in 1999.

COMETA · Ch. 2 (reference)Open the file
№ 17November 1989 – April 1990BelgiumContested

The Belgian Wave — F-16 radar locks, gendarmerie reports.

Over a five-month period, hundreds of ground witnesses across Belgium report a slow-moving, silent triangular craft with three white lights at the corners and a red light at the center. The Belgian gendarmerie collects the reports rather than dismissing them. On the night of 30–31 March 1990, two F-16s are scrambled. They achieve nine radar locks on objects whose kinematic profile no aircraft of the era can match — sustained 40g maneuvers, instantaneous accelerations, abrupt position changes.

The Belgian Air Force does something almost unprecedented for a NATO country: it formally cooperates with civilian researchers (SOBEPS), publishes the radar data, and convenes a press conference at which Colonel Wilfried De Brouwer says, on camera, that the case is unresolved.

COMETA references the Belgian Wave in its catalog of multi-national radar/visual cases that survived peer review.
COMETA Report · 1999

What ufologists say

The Belgian Wave is the most thoroughly investigated NATO-era UFO case. Hundreds of multi-witness reports, gendarmerie chain of custody, F-16 radar tapes, an Air Force colonel admitting publicly that the case was unresolved. That posture is unique.

The official line

Belgian Air Force (then): unresolved, but the radar data may have been confused by atmospheric conditions or unconventional aircraft. Some of the most famous "Petit-Rechain" photographs are now believed to be hoaxed; the photographer admitted the fake in 2011. The radar data, however, remains.

What the war.gov release adds

COMETA references the case but the primary SOBEPS dossier is in Belgian archives. The release does not deepen the Belgian Wave record — it places the case alongside Tehran and Lakenheath as cases the COMETA committee deemed worth their analysis.

COMETA · Ch. 2 (reference)Open the file
§ V

The modern military pipeline.

Tic Tac. AARO. Forty-nine "unresolved" cases declassified between 2025 and 2026 and routed through a new institutional pipe. The release-to-public gap is now measured in months, not decades.

№ 1814 November 2004Pacific, off Baja California · USS Nimitz Strike GroupModern

Nimitz / Tic Tac — the case that broke the modern silence.

The Nimitz Carrier Strike Group has been picking up unidentified objects on AN/SPY-1 radar for two weeks. On 14 November, Commander David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Jim Slaight launch an F/A-18F intercept. They find a Tic Tac-shaped white object hovering over the ocean. As Fravor dives toward it, the object mirrors his maneuvers, then accelerates impossibly fast and disappears. Minutes later it reappears at the CAP point — sixty miles away — at a closing speed Fravor calls "well beyond anything we had then or have now."

Lt. Cmdr. Chad Underwood captures the FLIR1 video on a follow-up sortie. The case sits classified for thirteen years. In December 2017, the New York Times publishes the video alongside Leslie Kean's reporting. The modern UAP era begins.

Specific Nimitz/Tic Tac material lives in earlier ODNI / AOIMSG releases and the December 2017 NYT publication. The May 2026 war.gov drop is not the Tic Tac drop.
Cross-reference note · this archive

What ufologists say

Nimitz is the post-2017 anchor case. Multiple aircrew witnesses, AEGIS radar lock, FLIR video, a kinematic profile no platform of the era could match, and a thirteen-year delay between the encounter and its public emergence. The pattern of "credible internal acknowledgment, decades of public denial" is the entire 1947 → 2004 record condensed into one event.

The official line

Pentagon (2017+): the FLIR1 video is authentic. The encounter is real. The objects remain unidentified. AARO (2022+) classifies similar encounters as "unresolved" pending further analysis. No Tic Tac-specific case file has been released to the public domain by AARO.

What the war.gov release adds

Not Nimitz itself. What the May 2026 drop adds is the modern operational successor: 49 PR-series "Unresolved UAP Reports" and ~80 D-series mission reports, mostly 2020–2026, all routed through AARO. Tic Tac was the case that justified the pipeline. This drop is the pipeline's first public output.

(External · ODNI 2021/2022)Open the closest in-corpus equivalent
№ 19August 2020 / October 2020Persian Gulf / Strait of Hormuz · USCENTCOMModern

USCENTCOM — UAP observations inside routine SIGINT/IMINT collection.

Two CENTCOM mission reports declassified by Major General Richard A. Harrison and approved for release to AARO. The first, MISREP 4685903 from August 2020, is a 21-mission-hour ISR sortie supporting NAVCENT operations across the Arabian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, and Gulf of Oman. Buried inside it: "AT 1527Z, OBSERVED 1X UNK FORMATION." Reported via standard tasking channels, with imagery exploited by DGS-1.

The second, MISREP 4871281 from October 2020, is similar — a 21-hour sortie, multiple guard calls, and one observation: "OBSERVED 1X UAP, SEE OBSERVATION LINE I." Both were declassified and routed for AARO release within months of public availability. The internal-to-public gap is no longer measured in decades.

USCENTCOM MDR 26-0028 — Approved for Release to AARO — FOUO/PA applies 03/16/26.
USCENTCOM Mission Report · Strait of Hormuz · Oct 2020

What ufologists say

The fact that UAP observations now flow through ordinary SIGINT/IMINT pipelines, rather than separate UFO tracks, is the single most important institutional change since Project Blue Book ended in 1969. Whatever this is, the Department of War now treats it as part of normal collection.

The official line

AARO (2022+): the routing of UAP encounters through standard reporting channels is intentional. It allows analysis without separate stovepipes. The "Unresolved" classification on PR-series reports means the analysis is incomplete, not necessarily that the encounter is anomalous.

What the war.gov release adds

The actual mission reports. Not summaries, not analysis — the underlying MISREPs, with mission hours, sensor types, AOC routing, and the operative observation line. This is the first time the public has seen what a UAP entry inside a CENTCOM ISR mission looks like in the original document.

DOW-UAP-D63 · Strait of Hormuz · L 13, 38Open the file
№ 202020 – 2026Worldwide · DOW PR-seriesModern

The 49 Unresolved UAP Reports.

The single largest operational UAP catalog ever publicly released. PR1 (Middle East, May 2022) through PR49 (Department of the Army, 2026). Geographic distribution: Greece, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Syria, Djibouti, "Africa 2025," INDOPACOM 2023–2024. Each case has a paired DVIDS video — most are FLIR/IR, some are color, a few are multi-sensor.

The cases share a vocabulary: silent, often spherical, sometimes triangular or oblong, observed by AF aircrews and INDOPACOM units, generally in operational theaters where US assets are routinely deployed. None are concluded. All are tagged "Unresolved." All are routed through AARO.

PR1 (Middle East 2022) → PR49 (Department of the Army 2026). 28 paired DVIDS videos. Geographic distribution: CENTCOM, INDOPACOM, EUCOM, AFRICOM. All "Approved for Release to AARO" in late 2025 / early 2026.
Cross-reference note · this archive

What ufologists say

This is the disclosure pattern people have been predicting since Tic Tac became public: a sustained, geographically diverse, multi-platform stream of officially unresolved cases coming through a single institutional pipe. Whatever the final explanation, the volume forces the question.

The official line

AARO: these are unresolved encounters in operational theaters. Some will likely be resolved as foreign drones, conventional aircraft, or natural phenomena. Some will likely remain unresolved. The release pipeline is intentional and ongoing.

What the war.gov release adds

This is what the war.gov release adds. The 49 PR-series files and the ~80 supporting D-series mission reports are the largest single-event UAP document drop in US history, routed through AARO and explicitly framed as the first of N. Drop 2 will tell you whether this is a steady-state pipeline or a one-time political moment.

./videos/ + ./pdfs/ — PR-series & D-seriesSee the full audit

Threads that run through the cases.

Five recurring patterns the corpus surfaces — each one is more interesting than any single case in isolation.

Nuclear adjacency

Roswell (1947) sits next to the only nuclear-armed bomber base in the world. Kirtland (1949) tracks 100 sightings over the AEC / AFSWP corridor. Kapustin Yar (1989) is a Soviet missile-base illumination. AARO's modern PR-series clusters in operational theaters where the US deploys nuclear-capable platforms.

Electromagnetic interference

RB-47 (1957) — ECM tracks an object outside ground-radar range. Tehran (1976) — two F-4s lose all comms at exactly 45 km, three times. Bariloche (1995) — town and airport lights fail. The EM cutoff is the single most temporally stable effect in the corpus.

Physical traces (France only)

Valensole (1965), Cussac (1967), Trans-en-Provence (1981), Amaranth (1982). Four cases, all France, all investigated by gendarmerie + GEPAN. The phenomenon is documented to leave ground impressions, multi-year directional plant kill, and a chlorophyll-amino-acid trauma signature attributed to a microwave field.

The internal-to-public gap

Twining 1947 → first public USAF acknowledgment ~74 years later. Kirtland 1949 → still no public USAF statement. DIA Tehran 1976 → ODNI 2021 closest alignment, ~45 years. Modern AARO releases: gap measured in months. The pattern flips abruptly between 2020 and 2025.

The disinformation thesis

COMETA explicitly classifies the 1994 USAF Mogul report as "reducing disinformation" and the 1995 alien-autopsy film as "amplifying disinformation" — a poison pill to discredit Roswell during the GAO inquiry. Hynek himself confessed to "trivializing numerous cases" by inventing astronomical explanations. The whole machinery is named, in the corpus.

See who actually wrote this canon — 15 researchers

Who actually wrote this canon.

Filled dot = named in this corpus. Outline dot = referenced only externally. Velasco is one of fifteen; the audit deliberately does not center him.

Kenneth Arnold

Witness · 24 Jun 1947

Civilian pilot. The Mt. Rainier sighting that started the modern era. Interviewed by AAF investigators on the same week as the Twining FBI memo.

FBI 62-HQ-83894 § 3

Maj. Jesse Marcel

Witness · 1947 · USAF

509th Bomb Group intelligence officer. Recovered Roswell debris. 1978 TV testimony reopens the case.

COMETA App. 5

Gen. Roger Ramey

Officer · 1947 · 8th AF

8th Air Force commander, Fort Worth. Orchestrated the weather-balloon press substitution. DuBose's 1991 affidavit confirms.

COMETA App. 5 · 5 hits

Gen. Nathan F. Twining

Officer · 1947 · AAF MC

Commander of AAF Materiel Command. The 23 Sept 1947 memo + the FBI's 19 Aug capture of his "wash out" posture.

FBI § 3 · COMETA · 46 hits

J. Allen Hynek

Astronomer · USAF consultant 1948–66

From Project Sign through Blue Book. Coined "close encounter" classifications. Late in life publicly admitted helping trivialize cases.

COMETA · 5 hits

Philip J. Klass

Skeptic · Aviation Week

Most prominent Anglophone debunker, 1960s–90s. COMETA explicitly calls his Tehran rebuttal "hardly convincing."

COMETA · several

Lt. Col. Philip J. Corso

Army R&D · 1961–63

Chief of Foreign Technology, Army R&D. The Day After Roswell (1997). Foreword by Sen. Thurmond, later retracted.

COMETA 9.1 · 8 hits

Jacques Vallée

Computer scientist · GEPAN

French-American astronomer, ex-GEPAN. Long-form physical-trace and mythology approach. Cited bibliographically in COMETA & FBI § 1.

2 files · 3 hits

Jean-Jacques Velasco

Director · SEPRA / GEIPAN 1983–04

French CNES. Trans-en-Provence is his canonical case. The COMETA report draws on his methodology directly.

COMETA throughout

Nick Pope

UK MoD · UFO desk 1991–94

Ran the British MoD's UFO desk (Sec(AS)2a). Public-facing in the 90s. Quoted in COMETA Ch. 9.2.

COMETA · 5 hits

Leslie Kean

Journalist · NYT 2017

Co-author of the December 2017 NYT piece that re-launched the modern UAP discussion. Earlier 2010 book references Mainbrace, Tehran, Bariloche.

COMETA · 4 hits

Stanton Friedman

Nuclear physicist · researcher

Brought Marcel back into public view (1978). Long-form Roswell investigator. Cited in canonical Roswell historiography.

External

Robert Hastings

Researcher · UFOs & Nukes

Compiled hundreds of nuclear-base UFO incidents from USAF retirees. The Kirtland 1949 cable is direct primary support for Hastings's thesis.

External

Lue Elizondo

Former AATIP · DoD

2017 NYT disclosure of AATIP's existence. Frequently cited in modern UAP discourse. No corpus mention.

External

David Grusch

Former NRO/NGA · Whistleblower 2023

26 Jul 2023 sworn testimony to House Oversight. Multi-decade NHI program claims. Entirely external to this drop.

External

Cases that are not in this drop.

Absence here means "not documented in this release," not "doesn't exist." Each gap is sourceable elsewhere; routes listed below.

  • Project Sign / GrudgeNational Archives RG-341
  • Project Blue Book primary docsProject Blue Book online release
  • Battelle Special Report 14 (1955)NICAP · DTIC
  • Robertson Panel report (1953)CIA FOIA reading room
  • Condon Report (1969)University of Colorado
  • Halt memo · Rendlesham (1980)UK MoD release · N. Pope
  • MJ-12 documentsTreat as unverified · COMETA does not endorse
  • AATIP / AAWSAP DIRDsKLAS Las Vegas
  • Skinwalker Ranch reportsBigelow / KLAS
  • 2023 Grusch testimonyHouse Oversight transcript
  • Nimitz 2004 specificsODNI 2021/2022 · AOIMSG predecessor
  • Belgian Wave SOBEPS materialsBelgian SOBEPS archive
  • JAL 1628 FAA tapeCallahan archive · FAA
  • Westall (1966, AU)Australian RAAF / external
  • Ariel School (1994, ZW)External · J. Mack archive
  • Phoenix Lights (1997)FBI Vault Serial 449 ref. only
  • Walton / Pascagoula / HillExternal (abduction record)
  • Coyne helicopter (1973)External · APRO files